Comparative Analysis of Vaccination Rates: Assessing the Impact of Community Pharmacies vs. Traditional Healthcare Settings on Immunization Coverage
Authors: Waseem N. Alshahrani, Saad M. Aldhafyan, Abdullah A. Alahmari, Mazen S. Alotaibi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13348101
Short DOI: https://doi.org/gt7ft9
Country: Saudi Arabia
Full-text Research PDF File:
View |
Download
Abstract:
Objective: This study aimed to compare vaccination rates between community pharmacies and traditional healthcare settings and to identify factors influencing these rates.
Methods: A comparative cross-sectional analysis was conducted involving 1,000 patients from community pharmacies and 1,000 patients from traditional healthcare settings. Data on vaccination rates, vaccine types, and patient demographics were collected and analyzed. Statistical comparisons were made to assess differences in vaccination rates and identify barriers and facilitators in both settings.
Results: Community pharmacies exhibited higher vaccination rates for influenza (55%) compared to traditional healthcare settings (48%, p=0.012). COVID-19 vaccination rates were also higher in community pharmacies (40%) versus traditional settings (35%), though this difference was not statistically significant. Community pharmacies reported advantages such as extended hours and no appointment requirements, while traditional settings faced challenges related to scheduling and access.
Conclusion: Community pharmacies play a crucial role in improving vaccination coverage, particularly for influenza vaccines. Their accessibility and convenience are significant factors contributing to higher vaccination rates. Integrating community pharmacies into vaccination strategies can enhance public health outcomes and address gaps in vaccine coverage.
Keywords: Vaccination rates, community pharmacies, traditional healthcare settings, influenza vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, public health
Paper Id: 231049
Published On: 2021-06-03
Published In: Volume 9, Issue 3, May-June 2021