International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences
E-ISSN: 2349-7300Impact Factor - 9.907

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Online Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 13 Issue 1 January-February 2025 Submit your research for publication

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mechanical CPR Devices Used by Paramedics on Cardiac Arrest Patient Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Setting

Authors: Faisal H. Bin Holiel, Fahad B. Alzahrani, Nayef A. Alshehry, Mohammed H. Alhallaf, Rayan M. Alqahtani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14512012

Short DOI: https://doi.org/g8v8xx

Country: Saudi Arabia

Full-text Research PDF File:   View   |   Download


Abstract: Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of mortality globally. Mechanical CPR devices, such as LUCAS-2 and AutoPulse, were developed to provide consistent and uninterrupted chest compressions, addressing the limitations of manual CPR.
Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of mechanical CPR devices in improving ROSC, survival, and neurological outcomes compared to manual CPR in a tertiary hospital setting.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 420 OHCA patients treated by paramedics. Patients were divided into two groups: mechanical CPR (n=210) and manual CPR (n=210). Primary outcomes included survival to hospital discharge, while secondary outcomes assessed pre-hospital ROSC and neurological recovery using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score.
Results: Pre-hospital ROSC rates were significantly higher in the mechanical CPR group (58.6%) compared to manual CPR (45.7%, p=0.01). Survival to hospital admission was also greater (71.4% vs 60.0%, p=0.01). Although survival to discharge favored mechanical CPR (33.3% vs 26.2%), it was not statistically significant (p=0.08). Neurological outcomes were significantly better in the mechanical CPR group, with 65.7% achieving favorable CPC scores (CPC 1–2) compared to 50.9% in the manual group (p=0.04).
Conclusion: Mechanical CPR devices improve ROSC rates, survival to admission, and neurological outcomes compared to manual CPR. While survival to discharge did not achieve statistical significance, mechanical CPR remains a valuable tool in prolonged resuscitation scenarios and patient transport.

Keywords: Mechanical CPR, Manual CPR, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, ROSC, Neurological Outcomes, Cerebral Performance Category, Tertiary Hospital, Pre-hospital Care.


Paper Id: 231860

Published On: 2021-05-06

Published In: Volume 9, Issue 3, May-June 2021

Cite This: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mechanical CPR Devices Used by Paramedics on Cardiac Arrest Patient Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Setting - Faisal H. Bin Holiel, Fahad B. Alzahrani, Nayef A. Alshehry, Mohammed H. Alhallaf, Rayan M. Alqahtani - IJIRMPS Volume 9, Issue 3, May-June 2021. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.14512012

Share this